Education for a Green World
Wednesday, June 25th, 2008
The Green Belt Movement (GBM) Kenya is a civil society organisation for women, based in Kenya, advocating for human rights and supporting good governance and peaceful democratic change through the protection of the environment. The organisation addresses the challenges of deforestation, soil erosion and lack of water by advocating for and training women to plant trees. According to GBM Kenya, this activity empowers women by making them environmental champions and by providing them with income-generating activities. The tree planting activities are also supported by civic education and networking. GBM Kenya was started in 1977 by Dr. Wangari Maathai, the first African woman and the first environmentalist to receive the Nobel Peace Prize in 2004. Educating a little person is a bit like tending to a tree. What I liked about the tree initiative is that the women who tended to the saplings naturally gave their children the tasks of watering them and checking the fencing and so on. This kind of thing enables young people to develop naturally in harmony with their environment. This idea of ‘natural human’ was very prominent during the development of democracy in the late 18th and 19th century and came to be known as romanticism. Most pertinent for us is Rousseau’s Emile, which became the blueprint for humanistic education. Because education in Europe was based on this humanistic philosophy, Dewey, Montessori, Steiner and also much of what is still in schools and the curriculum in the UK are great examples to us, as some of them were to Makiguchi. There is a lot of good work going on, the group work and pair work, as several contributors said, is part of that and is among the most important aspect of humanistic education isn’t it? Also it is vital to teach these ways to interact with others at the right stage of development. Certainly pre- and early teens should be beginning to think globally I would say. Thoreau believed that children at school should also take care of their own environment, as in the recycling scheme Christina wrote to us about. Wonderful! It always drives me mad in schools where the clocks don’t work and kids are learning electrics - repair the clocks!! A school I worked for in Somerset initiated a vegetable garden in its twin school in Zaire, which was then used to provide free school meals. A simple and sustainable solution. I would really like to emphasise at this point that because we are teaching a child and taking care about this one individual child’s developmental stage, that the way we teach is vital, and should itself be sustainable ie based on co-operation and creative leadership from the child and his or her peers. As work on sustainable education has shown us, if we begin to accidentally introduce authoritarian interaction into a classroom, we blow the whole thing. This is why we need careful and sustainable teaching methods, coherently interacting with the subjects we are using. We are not teaching the subject (although the child might well be learning it, hopefully anyway!), we are always teaching the child. There is a big difference between working together as in a tug of war, which is set up with each individual merely a component part, and group work used sustainably, where the group is egalitarian in its essence and based on the heightened development of each individual within the group. The purpose of the group is to encourage and support each individual within the group. This is human competition. When we work in groups and in peer settings, in a co-operative and student-led way, the output of every student is greatly enhanced, to the point of disbelief. The increase in ability according to every known method of measuring progress is so huge in sustainable education methods, that teachers are often questioned about their honesty in reporting the results! improvement of one of two levels however has been reported by systems teachers across the board, so it seems to be a universal result of using these child-centred methods. (Although the results improve, our aim must not be to improve results, as this would then corrupt the ’system’. The results improve as a result of increased confidence and support available as a result of being consulted as an individual about one’s own education and development. After a while, recording results would become irrelevant I suspect.) Some things seem to follow from Soka ideas of respect for life and the individual, such as being opposed to unnecessary animal testing. Because of this, we would want to teach subjects in a certain way, which would be ecological. For example, global history would be very different to the vastly differing versions of history we currently have to endure. Until now, sustainable education has been teaching in traditional authority-based classes about sustainable ideas, but this is unlikely to itself be enduring, unless we find a way to teach in a sustainable way. The emphasis is different, but important, and needs careful self-watching as we tend to fall back onto our own experience of education (or I do anyway) and careful and continuous planning. Also observing the individual children, and taking their lead. It’s quite a spiritual experience, as we feel our way being led by the child, and lose our own ego, and makes one feel very happy and fulfilled. The children do too!














